eNationalist Forums - Blogs

Seeking investors for WN community

Swaz — Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:53:33 GMT

I think I've found something pretty cool. It's an old scout camp in West Virginia on a lake that's been broken-up into parcels.

The one that caught my eye is 500 down, 1500 to close, 125k over 30 years @ 700 a month. With 14 bedrooms that's 50 bucks a month rent before utilities, if there were 14 investors.

There's another parcel with a giant gymnasium that could be converted, and another with a huge open-air music pavilion for concerts and rallies. And the best thing is they all border each-other. The more people we could get on board, the more parcels we could buy and connect them.

The parcels can be seen here: http://www.bkhaynes.com/Land.html

Before the housing bubble Haynes wanted over 400 grand per parcel. Now he's practically giving them away at 125 a pop. This place IS an old summer camp and while it looks to be in pretty good shape, it only has mosquito mesh for windows. But basically it just needs windows, to be insulated, paneled, and have some wood stoves put in. So it requires a bit of work. But showers, toilets an electricity are already in.

Haynes says livestock is cool as they used to have horses there, and there's plenty of room to grow food. Right now I'm really into self-sufficiency so this looks totally kick-ass. Also it's in West Virginia where the National Alliance is located.

If you have a reliable source of income (I get a 1000 a month from the government) I'd pony-up a quarter share tomorrow if I could find investors. I'll send you a check if anyone's out that way and gives it a clean bill of health. This is a great deal, so if anyone else is interested let me know.. PLEASE! I'm leaving Oregon in October 2012.

We shouldn't let this go by. with about six grand and enough people we could own this whole Goddamn camp!

Swaz

Wikipedia to go dark for 24 hours to protest anti-piracy bill

ein_hass — Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:33:20 GMT

Wikipedia will black out the English language version of its website Wednesday to protest anti-piracy legislation under consideration in Congress, the foundation behind the popular community-based online encyclopedia said in a statement Monday night.

The website will go dark for 24 hours in an unprecedented move that brings added muscle to a growing base of critics of the legislation. Wikipedia is considered one of the Internet's most popular websites, with millions of visitors daily.

"If passed, this legislation will harm the free and open Internet and bring about new tools for censorship of international websites inside the United States," the Wikimedia foundation said.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/...#ixzz1jk3YRLRw

Nigger Worship

Ryan J. Murdough — Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:58:06 GMT

Every year at this time I feel the need to write about Nigger worship since this is the time of year in which everyone is supposed to bow down and worship the ultimate nigger. Negroid worship extends much further than MLK however and I am simply sick of it all.

In school students are taught that MLK was nothing but a hero. In reality, he was a plagiarizing, thieving, prostitute abusing, nigger who spent his last night on Earth having sex with and physically abusing a few prostitutes. He was a Communist and many of his closest pals were well known Communist Jews. He plagiarized much of his doctoral dissertation, and he used S.C.L.C. funds to buy sex. He was simply a tool of communist Jews just like niggers today are tools in which the Jew uses to destroy us. If Whites are busy worshiping niggers and bowing to Jews, they most likely don�t have any pride and respect for their own people.

Nigger worship is a Jewish creation. The Jewish controlled media and entertainment industry constantly bombard us with nigger worship and many Whites have unfortunately bought into it because they have been forced to. Any White person who criticizes Blacks is immediately labeled a bigot, racist, or �Nazi� and most White people are not willing to take that risk. This is why I am using the term �nigger� and �negroid�. I refuse to let the Jews dictate which words I am not allowed to use. Referring to the word nigger as the �n word� is downright pathetic, as it proves just how badly the Jew has poisoned us. If we aren�t willing to say the word nigger we surely will not last much longer with the way things are going.

We have allowed the Jew to unleash niggers onto our streets so they can attack, rape, and murder our precious women while the Jewish controlled media goes out of its way to censor and many times not even cover violent crimes against Whites. The filthy Jews in the media glorify race mixing, especially if it is a Black man/White woman, while statistics prove that a White woman is much more likely to be murdered by a Simian boyfriend/husband than a White one. What do you think is more dangerous for a White female? Walking down a street at night in a nigger neighborhood or walking into a chimp�s pen at a zoo? If Negroids are about 13% of the U.S. population and if male Negroids make up half that number, that means that 6.5% of the population is responsible for the majority of the violent crime in the United States and much of it is committed against Whites. This is going on in our country but I am not supposed to use the word nigger?

The Jew media likes to trot out the rare Negroid with a PhD and put Nigger athletes up on pedestals to try and take the attention away from the fact that Niggers have never contributed anything substantial to the United States except for violent crime and AIDS. The Negroids who have never committed a crime do not make up for the destruction that Negroids have done to the United States and never will. As a race they are genetically incapable of creating and sustaining anything the White man has ever done. This is why multiracial nations have never been successful and never will be.

It cannot be stated enough that Negroids are merely tools of the Jews for our destruction. MLK was not a hero. He was just your average nigger who was managed by our eternal enemy and he has become the epitome of Nigger worship. The future does not look good for Whites unless we collectively oppose those who wish for our destruction. The day will come when Whites won�t be afraid to use the word �nigger� and when that day comes, victory will come soon after.

Christians must break the Jewish chains

Ryan J. Murdough — Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:51:40 GMT

Fear is powerful. Fear is what keeps White people from acting in the interests of their people. Since I became open about my racial views my life has changed. Some family and friends want nothing to do with me anymore. I wish that it did not have to be that way but I would much rather proudly speak the truth and let the pieces fall where they may rather than let the fear of being ostracized by people control my thoughts and beliefs. You see, that is the kind of society that we live in today. Sit down, shut up, and be a good little goy sheep and if you don�t, you will be punished. I have gotten better about picking my battles when it comes to discussions of race and religion but I have come to realize that I am totally incapable of ignoring reality and it is impossible for me to not do something about such obvious things. I am simply not wired that way.

The vast majority of Christians are good people, but they are scared and brainwashed. They are scared of even uttering a word about racial issues or God forbid, criticizing Jews and Israel. They will condemn books such as My Awakening and Mein Kampf despite the fact that they have never read a page of either book. They worry about being labeled a racist and an anti-Semite and they fear losing their precious social status. Most Christians will most likely tell you they have no problem with interracial relationships because salvation through Christ is attainable for anyone of any race. They either don�t believe in racial differences or they believe that as long as someone is a Christian they will be a productive citizen. Being a Christian doesn�t make someone more intelligent or less lazy, or even less violent for that matter. How many Christians go to church on Sunday, put on a happy face for all of their friends and then go home to verbally, mentally, and physically abuse their children? I bet it happens more than people realize. Some people are simply more capable of controlling their actions whether they are a Christian or not. Blood matters. Genes matter.

Being a Christian does not make a person more capable of creating and sustaining a nation either. Is Norway a great country because its population is Christian? Statistics say that only 13% of Norway�s population goes to church. White Nations are not successful because they are Christian. Our genetics and blood is what has created greatness around the world. Christianity was and is the overwhelming religion in the Western world but no amount of evangelism will ever make Blacks capable of creating anything that resembles what the White man has created. Genetically, Blacks simply do not have what it takes to create and sustain a civilized country equal to that of a Nation created by Whites. That is not hate. It is science and realism. In reality, when Blacks are left to fend for themselves and don�t have the White man taking care of them, the areas in which they reside turn into uncivilized wastelands. In 2011 the top 10 most livable states in America were New Hampshire, Utah, Wyoming, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Jersey, Vermont, Idaho, and North Dakota. With the exception of New Jersey, with a White population of 66%, they are overwhelmingly White and if the White population in New Jersey continues to decline, it is inevitable that the living conditions will worsen. The most violent and dangerous places in the United States are populated by Blacks and Hispanics. Christians don�t like talking about race. Even if Christians knew the truth about race they would much rather avoid the topic altogether. They would rather ignore reality in order to feel comfortable in their own little world but the problem with this is that their world is shrinking and someday they are going to realize that race does matter and that silence is no longer going to work for them. Someday White flight is no longer going to be possible because there won�t be anywhere else to flee. They are going to be forced to make a stand as White people, Christian or not. If they do not, their days will be numbered. White people are subconsciously following their racial instincts every time they move from an area with a growing non-White population to a nice, safe, White area. They may not admit it, but it is happening.

Christians most definitely don�t like talking about the Jewish issue and most will completely ignore or deny the fact that Jews dominate Hollywood and the mainstream media. Most of today�s Christian �leaders� have allowed themselves to become nothing but Jew puppets in order to appease organized Jewry so that the funds will keep flowing into their Judaized congregations. These leaders spew their poison about how everyone from every race can live in harmony as long as they all believe in Christ, except for the Jews of course. It is perfectly acceptable for Jews to preserve their blood but not us lowly White goyim. Miscegenation, non-White immigration, and an incredibly high non-White crime rate, all of which are supported by International and organized Jewry, are destroying the White race and the vast majority of Christians are doing nothing about it because they are scared. Most Christians are afraid to see the truth because they would be forced to challenge everything they have been conditioned to believe since they were a child. It is tough breaking those chains but it can be done and must be done. Many Christians have bought into the Zionist lies and propaganda spewed forth by the Jew bootlicking, scumbags like Jon Hagee and Glenn Beck. These wolves in sheep�s clothing are nothing but false prophets and are leading their flocks to their own enslavement and death. According to these traitors anyone who doesn�t cower and bow to Jews and Israel is an evil anti-Semite despite the fact that many Jews today would gladly crucify Christ all over again if they got the chance. When enough Whites break the chains and realize that the only solution for White people is a nation free from Jewry, things will change.

I don't blame people for criticizing Christians for what has become of White nations over the past few decades, hell I do it myself. The vast majority of Christians have allowed and/or used their faith to justify the genocide of White people all over the world and someday they will realize that they have been duped the same way non-Christian White sheeple will learn about truth and reality. It is undeniable that the actions and indifference of Christians on the issue of race has largely contributed to the destruction of White/European nations. Unfortunately, reality has to smack most people directly in the face for them to wake up and even then, some will still stay asleep. Unless we want our children to be enslaved by the Jewish masters who are currently pulling the strings in our own homelands, White Christians must stand up and throw off the Jewish chains so that they can truly be free.

Ryan J. Murdough
National Political Director
National Socialist American labor Party

Defending Emma West

Ryan J. Murdough — Sat, 03 Dec 2011 21:18:39 GMT

The recent video of a woman in the UK identified as Emma West, venting her frustration with non-White minorities aboard a Tram has generated worldwide attention. Unfortunately, she has been arrested since the video went viral and now she will truly feel the wrath of the Marxists that have utterly destroyed the UK with their genocidal immigration and multicultural policies. In the UK it is illegal for Whites to express their frustration over the fact that their country has quickly become a non-White hellhole by design. If a White mother is frustrated over the destruction of her homeland and is willing to vocalize it on a public tram filled with non-White immigrants, surely many other Whites in Britain must share her frustration but are obviously too fearful of expressing it. Emma West can see the future for her little boy in the UK and it scares her to death. Hopefully, her children are not subjected to re-education programs that will teach them to hate their own kind in order to progress the Judeo Marxist agenda that so many of our White youth have already been subjected to.

Enemies of the White race are portraying Emma West as mentally unstable because she openly vocalized her opposition to White genocide aboard a Tram filled with the people who have turned the UK into a non-White dumping ground. By attempting to portray Emma West as someone who has mental problems, our enemies are trying to convey a message that it is morally wrong for White people to openly oppose their own genocide. It is that simple. White people have two choices. They can sit back and watch their homelands be destroyed or they can stand up for their people and risk getting insulted, threatened, and possibly imprisoned. Notice how all of the people who are attacking this White mother are completely ignoring the fact that non-White immigration has turned the UK into non-White cesspool. It is not debatable. White people know what is going on but are simply too afraid to do or say anything about it. What is truly appalling is that many Whites are calling for violence against her and even her death. This just proves how much our people have been poisoned by the Jew. Aryans have been poisoned so deeply and effectively by the Jews and their Marxist/Communist agenda that they have actually trained us to fight each other when we fight back against those who wish for our destruction. This must end.

If our enemies are willing to jail a White mother for vocalizing her opposition to the genocide of her people there is nothing that our enemies will not do to destroy each and every one of us. Those of you who denounce National Socialism and shun Hitler but still call yourselves Nationalists need to open your eyes and stop playing the Jews game thinking that you will be safer while winning the White masses over at the same time. When more and more Aryans are treated like Emma West and they begin to fully realize the scope and magnitude of the situation they are in, they will yearn for another Hitler, and they will get him. The greatest disgrace on that Tram that day were the numerous Whites who attempted to look busy, texting, looking away, or rushing over to comfort the non-whites, when in reality they agree with everything Emma West said.

Four convicted in Knoxville kidnappings, torture murders to get new trials

ein_hass — Fri, 02 Dec 2011 20:42:05 GMT

KNOXVILLE � Judge Jon Kerry Blackwood has granted the motion for new trials for all four of the defendants convicted in the 2007 murders of Channon Christian and Chris Newsom.

The judge announced his decision just after noon central Thursday. The trials of the four defendants were presided over by former Judge Richard Baumgartner, who was removed from the bench after admitting he had a drug addiction.

The file of the TBI investigation outlined evidence that Baumgartner was likely impaired while presiding over those trials. Judge Blackwood was visibly upset as he talked about the decision he was to make.

He said he felt for the families and all of those who worked so hard on the cases, but he had no choice but to grant the retrials.
http://www.tennessean.com/article/20...text|FRONTPAGE

Canada goose jackets tend to be a terrific approach to maintain the warm

athleen — Thu, 24 Nov 2011 03:08:17 GMT

[url=http://www.goosejakkedanmark.com/ ]canada goose jakke danmark[/url] possess a tendency to become an awesome answer to retain the variety sensation in existence. Anytime you place on at ease as well as trendy North america goose overcoats, you cannot support slipping deeply in actually like with self-confidence also as character which North america goose overcoats present for you personally! For the well-known producer, North america Goose is actually move inside the type globe, North america Goose Clearance is continually around the release more and additional a great deal more type North america Goose gadgets to satisfy an awesome deal far more people design specifications. Overcoats are inclined to be an efficient way linked with keeping an individual comfortable within the chilly situations linked with winters. Also, they are spot on inside the summers due to numerous women and men Cost-effective North america Goose simply thanks to the brilliant seem they give you. The actual North america goose overcoats will usually be in fact well-known anytime we examine the design globe. Each females and males appear to come to be totally enthusiastic concerning the genuine bran due to the comfy overcoats it offers.With regard to guys that splash oil canada goose danmark a superb deal much more official circumstances, the jean parts North america goose coat supplied the clothing also as pants is often a rapidly viewpoint to possess minimize afterwards to start out dating ? operating with all the spot of carry out. Exactly what anytime the real framework, the basic appropriately wearied glowing blue outer shell rests inside pretty easy reality on seriously guys, irrespective of create older. For girls, North america goose sale.Denim is really particularly very a bit a whole lot a lot more connected with North america goose products. Innovative designers want denim aside from continually make also as restyle each and every North america goose overcoats at the same time as denim jeans for the shifting months. Denim on manliness fault Epitomize tranquil acquainted put on or probably a great ultra-stylish create charges.

Irrespective of what in advance of the occasion, choose jerseys licensed could perhaps construct a denim North america goose coat that could possibly be synchronized contrain just about apportionment more ensemble.North america goose overcoats is going to become truly desirable character. North america Goose Mitts Dark For sale Favor to perform nearly all could possibly be the Canadian product revenue possess recognize hair layer because of absolutely everybody canada goose jacka,quite a bit of candidates coat.

These people involve the cosy internal layer help you to help keep your total physique comfy, and possess heavy wallets, also wear-resisting. Every the hair layer North america goose produces has got the precise incredibly similar basic components, immediately just after which modifications the 1st sort of manufacturing. Search development is surely an essential component offered region, item revenue related with improvement. North america goose Mitts Azure For sale North america hair layer on the web is going to become your [url=http://www.goosejakkedanmark.com/ ]canada goose outlet danmarkr[/url].

Mark Weber must resign from the Institute for Historical Review

ein_hass — Fri, 18 Nov 2011 02:42:52 GMT

Mark Weber must resign from the Institute for Historical Review, remaining free to establish, if he wishes, a body for the struggle against what he calls �the Jewish-Zionist power.� He has, in effect, recently announced in a veiled way his abandonment, if not of revisionism, then at least of the revisionist fight. He therefore no longer belongs at the head of an institute whose main job is to combat what Arthur R. Butz so rightly calls The Hoax of the Twentieth Century.

Weber knows that there�s sometimes not too much danger in speaking out against the �Jewish-Zionist power.� Even some Jews and Zionists at times attack that power as well. On the other hand, he is also fully aware that it�s always highly dangerous to commit the least transgression against the Jews� and Zionists� sacred cow, their supreme taboo, i.e. their secular religion of �the Holocaust,� and this is a risk he no longer wants to run. The text he entitled �How Relevant is Holocaust Revisionism?� bears the date �January 2009,� with no further precision, but I suppose he finished it in late December 2008. He was stirred to write it by the ever more pressing requests I�d had to make, over quite a number of years, of the IHR�s director in order to know finally whether or not he believed in the �Jewish genocide� and the �Nazi gas chambers.� My first request for enlightenment goes back to April 20, 1993 (!), and the last two date from September 16 and December 2, 2008. To relate just the final one of these, it carried the following two questions:

1) Do you believe that the Germans decided and planned a physical destruction of the Jews of Europe? (�the specific crime�); 2) Do you believe in the existence and use by the Germans of homicidal gas chambers or gas vans? (�the specific weapons of the specific crime�).

For fifteen years, instead of answering me frankly, Weber had piled up equivocations and evasions. I suppose that, on receiving my request of December 2, 2008, he sensed that my patience had run out and that I was about to make public this stubborn refusal of his to give any clarification. He therefore had to seize the initiative and explain himself publicly on the question of revisionism.

That�s what he attempts to do in his text dated �January 2009,� but I note that once again he tries to slip out of it. The questions I put amounted to asking: �Are you really a revisionist?� However, here he is stating that revisionism itself is hardly �relevant,� which, I assume, means that it is �of no great interest.� He concludes that revisionism is of course still �a worthy endeavor.� He adds nonetheless: �But there should be no illusions about its social-political relevance. In the real world struggle against Jewish-Zionist power, Holocaust revisionism has proved to be as much a hindrance as a help.�

That�s quite a remarkable bit of news! From the very mouth of the man who�s been running the Institute for Historical Review since 1995, we learn all of a sudden that that institute is henceforth going to devote itself first of all to the fight against Judeo-Zionism and that, in this new combat, according to Weber, revisionism is, in itself, just as �irrelevant� as it is �relevant.� He goes as far as to add that, in the combat to which he intends to commit himself from now on, revisionism will be considered, at least in part, a �hindrance�!

I�m pleased at having finally obtained in this way, from Weber in person, the disclosure of a secret he�d been keeping from us till now. Of course, he sidesteps my questions once again but at least now � though not without difficulty � I�ve made him take off his mask and proclaim that he is giving up the revisionist fight as such.

1. From 1979 to 1989 he gave me the impression of being a revisionist

It was in 1979 that I made my acquaintance with Weber. He�d invited me to stay at his home in Arlington, Virginia, and helped me with my research at the National Archives both in Washington and in Suitland, Maryland. At the time, he told me he�d begun work as well on �the Holocaust� and, in particular, on the aerial photographs of Auschwitz and the Einsatzgruppen. I found in him a researcher endowed with good intellectual qualities and also a man who, whilst openly showing vigorous far-right convictions, seemed without character. It even seemed that, if he so admired strength or energy, it was because he himself was weak, timorous, hesitant. In contrast, his compatriot Arthur R. Butz, whom I�d met in Paris a few years before and whom I met again that year in the United States, appeared to possess not only exceptional intellectual qualities but also solid character.

Still in 1988, Weber was apparently a revisionist. It was in that capacity that he gave evidence under oath as an expert witness at the Z�ndel trial in Toronto. Yet in the years that followed, before the growing difficulties encountered by revisionism, he seemed to me to lose heart, which was understandable. It was at this time that he, in all honesty, ought to have got off the revisionist ship, openly and for all to see. Unfortunately, he preferred to keep his post at the IHR and, from 1995, the remuneration that came with the office of director. From then on he doomed himself to play a kind of double game. He let his subscribers and collaborators believe he was continuing in the revisionist struggle but, in reality, he was already starting to scuttle the vessel entrusted to him.

In 1989 he agreed to accompany Fred Leuchter and me in our examinations of Dachau, Mauthausen and Hartheim. He was strongly impressed by the nature of our investigation work, largely similar in method to that of police inspectors, both technical (on site) and scientific (in the laboratory). But truth compels me to say that he also, on more than one occasion, exhibited such fright that, in Germany, I thought to myself: �Here we�ve got a real softy of a revisionist, someone who may well abandon us should serious difficulties arise.�

Sometimes I�ve seen him go pale at the sight of our boldness and, in particular, when he happened to hear the noisy work of F. Leuchter on site. Leuchter couldn�t avoid making something of a racket banging out tiny fragments from the walls of the so-called homicidal �gas chambers� with his chisel. As the pieces fell to his feet he took the time, keeping his protective mask on, to gather them up slowly and scrupulously. Had a guard come by at that instant, we could well have found ourselves under arrest. The risk had to be run but it set Weber�s teeth chattering. I was embarrassed for him.

2. In 1991, in Munich, I discover his fright in the midst of the revisionist struggle

The scene is a hotel in Munich on March 23, 1991, where Ernst Z�ndel has made an appointment with fellow revisionists for the �Leuchter-Kongre�.� Personally, I had arrived from Paris where, in the Palais de Justice over the previous two days, I�d had to confront Jewish commandos who assaulted and injured a certain number of those present. I myself was hurt and, upon entering the courtroom, was also spat upon. They were two rough days, the second ending only quite late in the evening.

Once out of court I slipped into a car driven by a brother-in-law of mine who, as it happens, is an excellent driver and who, going along at full throttle, got us to Munich at 5 AM. I hadn�t slept a wink all night and wanted to rest a bit in my hotel room. At 7 AM, we learn that Ernst Z�ndel has been arrested by the police. Weber is there. He�s trembling like a leaf. He tells me there can no longer be any question of holding the scheduled conference. I object, saying the arrest of our mutual friend makes it an obligation for us to stay the course. He trembles even more and, overcome with fear, stammers: �But, but, but, Robert, we are revisionists; we are not Zundelists!�

He entreats me to drop the whole thing, saying we�ll all be arrested. The tears well up in his eyes. We go down into the hotel�s main salon where confusion reigns among the revisionists. The supposed organiser of the meeting, Ewald Althans, has a rather vacant look about him. We�ll learn much later that he was working for the police, who had bought him! I try to take charge of things. I declare that the conference must go ahead at all costs. I add that, since Ernst is now in jail, we must take the risk of joining him there. �Ah!,� David Irving tells me, �but I have no desire at all to go to jail!�

Happily, Leuchter supports my proposal. The assembly decides that the conference will be held. As the police have closed the museum where it was supposed to take place, it takes place outside, in front of the museum and in the cold. There we group together with our sympathisers, some of whom have travelled a very long way. The speeches will be brief, except for that of a German lawyer who gets somewhat worked up giving a long talk before a small, chilly crowd.

3. In 1993, in Washington, Weber states that �maybe� the gas chambers existed

It was on April 20, 1993, with a little incident in Washington, that I began to harbour doubts about Weber�s revisionist convictions. He�d suggested we meet for dinner at a Chinese restaurant with some people who regularly got together once a week to talk about current affairs. The Holocaust Memorial Museum was just opening. Thus the occasion came up for me to discuss the revisionist argumentation with these people.

There were ten of us around the table. To start off, I wanted to have each one�s opinion on the question of the �gas chambers.� �Did the Nazi gas chambers ever exist?� I asked each person, one by one, beginning at my left and going on clockwise, to answer the question with a �Yes,� a �No� or a �Maybe.� The first four all answered �Yes.� The fifth, a young woman, ventured a �No� but only half-heartedly. The sixth person at the table was Mark Weber. Twisting in his chair, he answered: �Maybe� and the others coldly answered �Yes.� I announced that my own answer was: �No, definitely not,� and firmly spelled out my reasons.

Then, disgusted by the way Weber had deserted the cause, I barely touched my dinner. Afterwards we were outside, he and I, walking back in silence to Georgetown and the home of Andrew Gray, our host. When turning in, I took leave of Weber with an ironical: �Good night, Mr. Maybe.�

The next day, he spontaneously offered his excuses, telling me he should never have answered as he did the evening before.

Just then the telephone rang: a reporter from a local Black community radio station wanted to ask Weber some questions about the Holocaust Memorial Museum. And there, with the opportunity arising for him to show the extent to which that museum was amassing pure lies, notably on the �gas chambers,� Weber was content merely to denounce what he called �distortions by the museum� and gave just one example of these, an almost trivial one: the story, in fact wholly untrue, of the Dachau camp�s alleged liberation by Blacks.

Once the conversation was over I rebuked him for his faint-heartedness, but he retorted that that was the way to go about things, meaning that with journalists it was best to be diplomatic if you wanted to be in good graces with them. Therefore he�d talked to his journalist neither about �genocide� nor �gas chambers,� nor Auschwitz, nor any of a score of other holocaustic lies. I�ll note here that in general Weber is an atrocious debater, careful as he is to ingratiate himself with the opponent or the master of ceremonies, sometimes even to the point where one may wonder what side he�s on.

4. From 1994 to 2002, Weber sinks into inaction

I could cite other anecdotes that are just as significant. Weber is a man of amiable company, there�s no nastiness about him, and one can generally trust what he writes in the way of history. He expresses himself with caution and moderation, backing up what he says with sources and references, without seeking to show off his knowledge and in comprehensible language but also, as must be admitted, in a rather limp style, with a school-like scent to it.

He lacks subtlety. Moreover, he�s a waverer. And at the IHR office, spending hours on the telephone, he impedes the work of his colleagues with the volume of his endless conversations. He has never published, either in English or any other language, a book or collection of articles, and, in particular, no one has yet seen the manuscript of the work he was at one time fixing to bring out under the title � a provisional one � The Final Solution: Legend and Reality.

Up to a certain point I have happened to sympathise with him in view of his lot. The life of a revisionist is made up of so many trials, disappointments and repeated failures that it�s hard not to subside into pessimism. At times the temptation to abandon such a perilous cause is strong. At the period in question, revisionism was of course not in a state of crisis, thanks especially to the heroic struggle of Ernst Z�ndel, then, much later, thanks to the unbelievable energy of Germar Rudolf; yet the IHR, led by Weber, was worse and worse off.

The story of the near-wrecking of our institute is too well known for me to go into it here. Try as they might, Ted O�Keefe and Greg Raven, each in his turn, found it impossible to keep things on an even keel. To begin with, Weber�s inaction left them totally disconcerted They couldn�t understand either the man or his conduct. For my part, it was at the lamentable international congress of June 2002 that I grasped that, under Weber�s sway, the IHR was perhaps heading towards a gradual abandonment of �Holocaust� revisionism. On July 9, 2002, Butz wrote a critique, with a title descriptively asking �Quo Vadis?,� examining the mission of IHR and the implications of O�Keefe�s sacking. The message was directed to the IHR staff, board, and editorial advisory committee members only. In any case, that congress was the last and, subsequently, from 2003 till now, Weber was to prove incapable of organising an international conference worthy of the name. Butz finally resigned in January 2003, mainly over productivity issues, but also raising objections to the intellectual content of the Journal.

5. In 2003, I call on Weber to explain himself. He sidesteps. I submit my resignation

When I thought I sensed Weber might be about to give up the revisionist fight, I wanted to be clear in my own mind about it. I asked him to reply to me frankly. At first I did so gently, with delicacy, then with a certain insistence and, finally, curtly. But he went on continually dodging the issue and, invoking our long-standing friendship, said he was surprised at my questions.

No longer putting up with this, I summoned him in writing to answer me clearly and briefly: did he by any chance believe in the �Nazi gas chambers� and in a policy of physical extermination of the Jews? On December 15, 2003, he ended up replying: �I do not like to say that �the Nazi gas chambers never existed,� in part because I do not regard myself as any kind of specialist of �gas chambers,� and in part because I avoid making such categorical statements (on any subject).� Shortly before he had stated on an American radio talk-show: �I do not deny the Holocaust happened.�

On December 17th I therefore sent him a message asking him to remove my name from the IHR�s Editorial Advisory Committee. The following day G. Rudolf, who�d received a copy of my message, told me of his full approval. He had long been a strident critic of Weber�s performance. On the 19th, after informing me that he regretfully accepted my resignation, Weber sought to justify himself in a pitiful and fallacious manner on which I shall not dwell here.

Other revisionists also expressed their strong disapproval of Weber�s conduct. At the time Paul Grubach had not shrunk from writing: �Mark Weber is to be congratulated [�]. I now understand his position, which is fine with this Holocaust revisionist [�]. Let it suffice to say that Mark Weber is one of the world�s most important Revisionist scholars,� but he was later to become disenchanted, condemning the director of the IHR in the severest terms.

6. Remarks I made to set the record straight on December 22, 2003

More of the exchange of Dec. 2003, parts of which are reproduced below, is reproduced here. On December 22, 2003, I sent Weber the following message:

I shall briefly sum up for you what, precisely, our recent exchange of correspondence has been. For greater clarity, I find myself obliged to emphasize certain words of this exchange, although I do not care for the practice. You will see that, contrary to what you venture to say, the letter that I sent you and made public on 17 December [2003] was neither �misleading� nor �unfair.� You will also see, at the end of this reply, that you have made a monumental muddle of a text of mine of which you quote a very brief fragment; by so doing, you have been �misleading� or �unfair� or both. In conclusion, I will show that this controversy may in the end lead to a heartening prospect for the future of revisionism.

My question of 17 December was: �Tell me whether or not you SAY, as I myself have so clearly STATED for so many years, that the alleged Nazi GAS CHAMBERS and the alleged Nazi GAS VANS never EXISTED.� The question was clear: it focused 1) on what you SAY or STATE, 2) on the very EXISTENCE, 3) of the alleged Nazi GAS CHAMBERS, 4) and of the alleged Nazi GAS VANS.

Instead of answering this question directly, you wrote back: �I don�t believe the claims about the alleged Nazi gas chambers.� That act of faith was not what I was looking for. Effectively, whereas I was waiting to see what you, as a historian, would SAY or STATE, you answered by what you DIDN�T BELIEVE. Then, you asserted that you did not BELIEVE in CLAIMS, a particularly vague word; the remark may mean that you refuse to believe certain statements concerning the said gas chambers, but not necessarily all such statements; the choice of the word �CLAIMS� may mean that you call into question certain aspects of the story of the Nazi gas chambers (their number, location, performance) but not necessarily the affirmation of their existence itself. Finally, with such a sentence you do not, as all may see, breathe a word of the �gas vans.�

Noting that with so vague a sentence you had not gone into the subject, I did not feel the need to deal with it in my letter itself, but in the accompanying message, addressed to Jean Plantin, Yvonne Schleiter and Arthur Butz at the same time as to you, I plainly told you: �I did not ask for your �beliefs� (?) about �claims� (?) and, moreover, you do not mention the Nazi gas vans.�

Nor did I deal with your prologue regarding at once Dachau, Mauthausen, Hartheim and your �limited� knowledge of technical and chemical matters. As is my habit, I went straight to the heart of the matter and so it was that, leaving to one side everything of the order of more or less trifling preliminary remarks, I extracted from your response the lone sentence that constituted an answer, FINALLY, to the question put. And that answer was as follows: �I do not like to say that the �Nazi gas chambers never existed,� in part because I do not regard myself as any kind of specialist of �gas chambers,� and in part because I avoid making such categorical statements.�

I think it useless here to run once more through the remarks that such a pitiful answer inspires me to make. It is typical of what I call �spineless Revisionism.� At the 2002 conference, I protested against this form of revisionism and suggested that, in future, revisionists come out fighting. I find comical the insistence of some revisionist �researchers� on still looking into �the problem of the gas chambers.� We are not about to carry on this way till the end of time killing what has already, on the commonsense level, been �overkilled.� But with our �researchers� the corpse of the �Nazi gas chambers or vans� is buried, then exhumed to be put in a coffin into which one more nail is driven. The role of an Institute like the IHR ought to be to come out with a formal assertion, one requiring neither technical nor chemical expertise but rather of the simplest kind: For more than half a century, Germany�s accusers have in the end revealed their inability to let us see a single specimen of the alleged weapons of mass destruction that the Nazis are said to have designed, built or used for �the Destruction of the European Jews� (Raul Hilberg).

Whatever you do, don�t moan that: �Given that you have not pressed me for my view on Nazi gas chambers during the past ten years or so, I don�t understand why you have been pressing me on this in recent weeks.� In reality, you know perfectly well that there has been this point of discord between us for quite a long time. I have reminded you of the instance at which you and I confronted one another on it ten years ago in Washington. There was also, though you seem not to remember, another instance, over the telephone, on the subject of a statement of yours during a talk-show on a Black radio station. And I am not the only one to deplore Mark Weber�s shilly-shallying with regard to the gas chambers. I can recall Fritz Berg rightly complaining of your dodging the question. Carlos Porter also seems to find you are dancing around. I myself have had to approach you more than once in order to get you to respond. And now, finally, that your response is known, it is understandable why you have tried to dodge an irksome question. But, is it normal, Mark Weber, to conceal from the IHR�s readers, members, dues-paying supporters that their editor perhaps refuses, to a certain degree, to BELIEVE a lie and a historic slander but DOES NOT LIKE to have to say so? How many people imagine that for the Editor of the Journal of Historical Review a proper reply to that slander is: �I do not like to say that �the Nazi gas chambers never existed��?

During the above-mentioned talk-show, you stated: �I do not deny the Holocaust happened but �� I immediately told you how deadly wrong it was to make such a CONCESSION to The Big Lie and Defamation. You retort now that in 1991 I myself declared: �Revisionists do not deny the genocide and the gas chambers.� There you make a fine muddle. I said then, on the contrary, that by the acceptance of the word �deny� an untoward CONCESSION was made to the liars. I give you below the full text of my remark, which was published under the altogether unambiguous title �AFFIRMATION, NOT DENIAL�:

A reminder: Revisionists do not deny the genocide and the gas chambers. This is a MISCONCEPTION. Galileo didn�t deny that the earth was stationary; he AFFIRMED, at the conclusion of his research, that the earth was not stationary, but that it rotated on its axis and revolved around the sun. In the same way, the revisionists, after concluding their own research, AFFIRM that there was no genocide and no gas chambers, and that the �final solution of the Jewish question� consisted of the removal of the Jews from Europe � by emigration if possible, and by deportation if necessary. � The revisionists strive to establish what happened; they are positive while the exterminationists doggedly continue to tell us about things which didn�t happen: their work is negative. � The Revisionists stand for the reconciliation of the antagonists in the recognition of what really happened. (The Journal of Historical Review, January-February 1999, p. 21).

In other words, I make with that remark the opposite of a CONCESSION. In a general way, not only do I expose the enthusiasts of the Big Lie for what they are, but I also refuse to borrow their least turn of phrase. The revisionists must show themselves to be candid, unbending and without CONCESSION. The time for CONCESSIONS is over [�]. It is pitiful when the head of an institute of revisionist studies is reduced to confessing: �I do not like to say that the Nazi gas chambers never existed.� It is regrettable that he should have concealed that attitude up to now and that only my insistence on getting an answer on the subject made him come out with it. It is a pity that, seeking to vindicate his position, he wrongly accused me of having been �misleading and unfair.� It is lamentable that in the dispute with me he should bring up a text of mine whose meaning he distorts to the point of turning it entirely around.

But it is heartening to see that I am now far from alone in denouncing a revisionism that has had its day and in advocating a new revisionism, more clear-cut, straightforward, vigorous and able, for a start, to put it to the upholders of the Big Lie that �The best proof that your Nazi gas chambers and your Nazi gas vans did not exist any more than your Jewish soap, your lampshades of human skin and so much other nonsense of a vile war propaganda is that, more than fifty years after that war, your �scientific experts� are, more than ever, unable to show them to us.�

This new revisionism, which demands character, calls for young and spirited men.

7. In 2008, his progressive abandonment of revisionism is confirmed

In 2007, Fritz Berg, Bradley Smith and other revisionists again asked Weber to explain himself, but to no avail.

On August 16, 2008, Weber gave a talk near Baltimore entitled �In the Struggle for Peace and Justice: Countering Jewish-Zionist Power�. Not for an instant did he mention the number one weapon of that power, that is, the lie of �the Holocaust�! I exhibited my surprise and asked him to provide some enlightenment. He did not answer.

I wrote him again. On September 2 he sent me an answer that wasn�t one. I wrote to him yet again with my request. Then it was that he answered me with the following two sentences: �In my presentation at the conference on August 16, I did not speak about �the Holocaust� because that was not the subject or the point of my address. When Dr. Siddique invited me to the conference, he asked me to give an address similar to earlier ones that he himself had heard or read.�

The latter sentence informs us, incidentally, that this hadn�t been our conference speaker�s first such skirting of the question: as one can see, he had already in the past deliberately adopted the practice of excluding from his talks all trace of any dispute of �the Holocaust.� I then replied: �Pitiful. It was a point of your address. Obviously. Necessarily. In the first place why did you [till now] avoid giving me those �explanations�?�

On September 9, 2008, Weber published �A Zionist Smear: The ADL Attacks an Islamic Peace Conference.� On the 16th, I consequently sent him the following new request for clarification:

More than ever I need some clarification about your position on �the Holocaust.� I am not the only one seeking this clarification.

On reading your September 9, 2008 piece �A Zionist Smear: The ADL Attacks an Islamic Peace Conference,� anyone, I suppose, would infer that, for a certain man called Mark Weber, the Institute for Historical Review (IHR) was not a �Holocaust denial organization� and that it was even a �smear� to say such a thing. To say such a thing would be �at variance with the facts,� indeed �completely at variance.� In that text M. Weber considers himself a �responsible scholar of twentieth century history� and seems to consider that the IHR is an entity made up, partly or wholly, of other such responsible scholars (Faurisson being one of them?). He also seems to define �the Holocaust� as �the [� definite article �] great catastrophe [� in Hebrew, �Shoa�? �] that befell European Jewry during World War II.� Then M. Weber points out that, in his recent talk outside Baltimore, he mentioned the deaths of Jews during that great catastrophe in quoting from a speech by someone else to the effect that �the Europeans killed six million Jews out of twelve million.� In doing so, M. Weber, who is a responsible scholar, seems to think it worthwhile to mention that assertion and those figures without criticising them in any way.

Mark, as you�ll surely have noticed, I�ve used the word �seems� so many times because I need some clarifications. In order to get them, I request that you let me put a few questions:

1 - Do you believe that �the Europeans killed six million Jews out of twelve million�?; if not, please tell me what your own opinion is concerning both the word �killed� and the figures of �six� and �twelve million.�

2 - Do you believe that the Germans decided on and planned a physical destruction of the European Jews? (�the specific crime�).

3 - Do you believe in the existence and the use by the Germans of homicidal gas chambers or gas vans? (�the specific weapons of the specific crime�).

Please, make an effort really to address these questions and, for example, please avoid coming down with arguments such as: �How is it that you�ve waited till now to ask such questions?� or: �But, Robert, the IHR website is publishing papers like yours!� In our recent exchange on the matter, your replies were not clear and my last message was left unanswered.

So that you don�t believe I am alone among the revisionists in thinking there is a real problem with your being the head of a revisionist publication or website, allow me to tell you that, before drafting this very message, I asked a few people whether they had the slightest idea what your exact convictions were on the core of �the Holocaust.� One of these was Ted O�Keefe. Let me quote him here (with his express permission), from September 15, 2008:

By now I�ve received and read all of your emails on the latest with Mark. I agree that he has shamefully sidestepped the questions of whether the Holocaust as defined by the Jews took place, and the importance of the Holocaust imposture in the Jews� propaganda and policies.

As I made public in 2002, Mark has long been impotent to advance the program for which the IHR was founded and sustained.

I can now add that by his lawyerly evasions and cowardly omissions he continues to squander what�s left of the IHR�s intellectual and moral capital, and to betray the sacrifices made not only by revisionists such as you and Ernst Zuendel and Germar Rudolf, but also by the numerous supporters of the Institute over the years.

8. Is he taking us for fools?

On September 23, 2008, I received in the mail a sheet with the IHR letterhead signed by Weber and entitled �A Productive Summer.� It was a letter calling for donations. Rarely can such a misnomer of a title have been seen anywhere. The text told of talks, interviews, meetings, shows, broadcasts but all bearing no relation to the �Holocaust� lie. It reported on a �memorable IHR meeting on June 14 [2008],� but the only two participants at that meeting were Irving and Weber. The former told of �his harrowing arrest in Austria, his sensational trial in Vienna, and his 13-months� imprisonment there. He also spoke about wartime Germany�s harsh treatment of Jews, presenting a view of �the Holocaust� similar to the one he laid out years ago in the first edition of his book, Hitler�s War.�

However, Irving has never in his life really disputed �the Holocaust� and especially not in the first edition of that book of his. He is at the very most but a �reluctant revisionist,� often changing his mind on a matter that he at times admits to not having studied. He sometimes even happens to utter abominations on the subject of the German people that are worthy of Daniel Jonah Goldhagen. As for the other speaker, himself, Weber wrote: �In my talk, I took aim at the American national mythology about World War II. I spoke about two new books about the war, by Patrick Buchanan and by Nicholson Baker, praising them as important antidotes to the familiar, much propagandized portrayal of the conflict.� Here it�s seen that on this occasion Weber did not bring up what was always the IHR�s raison d��tre and primary vocation: the revising of the �Holocaust� myth.

9. A lie to end with?

In January 2009, then, he published the bit entitled �How Relevant is Holocaust Revisionism?� about which I�ve already said a few words in the beginning lines of this article. Just about every paragraph of the piece, a typical Weber text in its style, would call for some severe remarks and rectifications. I shall refrain from making any, however, and dwell on one point and one point alone where it seems to me I�ve caught Weber in the act, an act of dishonesty. He wrote:

A major reason for the lack of success in persuading people that conventional Holocaust accounts are fraudulent or exaggerated is that � as revisionists acknowledge � Jews in Europe were, in fact, singled out during the war years for especially severe treatment.

This was confirmed, for example, by German propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels in these confidential entries in his wartime diary:

Feb. 14, 1942: �The F�hrer [Hitler] once again expresses his resolve ruthlessly to clear the Jews out of Europe. There must be no squeamish sentimentalism about it. The Jews have deserved the catastrophe that they are now experiencing. Their destruction will go hand in hand with the destruction of our enemies. We must hasten this process with cold ruthlessness.�

March 27, 1942: �The Jews are now being deported to the East from the Generalgouvernement [Poland], starting around Lublin. The procedure is a pretty barbaric one and not to be described here more definitely, and there�s not much left of the Jews. By and large, one can say that 60 percent of them will have to be liquidated, while only 40 percent can be put to work. The former Gauleiter of Vienna, who is carrying out the operation, is proceeding quite judiciously, using a method that is not all too conspicuous. The Jews are facing a judgment which, while barbaric, they fully deserve. The prophecy the F�hrer made about them for having brought on a new world war is beginning to come true in the most terrible manner. One must not be sentimental in these matters.�

April 29, 1942: �Short shrift is being made of the Jews in all eastern occupied territories. Tens of thousands of them are being wiped out.�

No informed person disputes that Europe�s Jews did, in fact, suffer a great catastrophe during the Second World War. Millions were forced from their homes and deported to brutal internment in crowded ghettos and camps. Jewish communities across Central and Eastern Europe, large and small, were wiped out. Millions lost their lives. When the war ended in 1945, most of the Jews of Germany, Poland, the Netherlands and others countries were gone.

Given all this, it should not be surprising that even well-founded revisionist arguments are often dismissed as heartless quibbling.

We�ve read correctly: according to Weber, during World War II �millions [of Jews] lost their lives.� What right has this man of ours to come out with that estimate in figures? Where exactly in the holocaustic literature is any proof of what he puts forth here to be found? Where, in his own writings, had he ever said and proved it?

But that�s not all. His exploitation here of those excerpts from Goebbels�s diary is stupefying. The Propaganda Minister�s comments bear the stamp of a National-Socialist propagandist�s phraseology, and are on the subject of events in which he had no personal part, no direct responsibility and of which he, in Berlin, had merely heard talk. In Toronto in 1988, during the second Z�ndel trial, Weber, at his end, had above all stated that according to him there was �a great doubt about the authenticity of the entire Goebbels diaries,� and had insisted on the fact that the contents of the March 27, 1942 note were particularly suspect. These were his very words under oath:

The later entry, which I think is the 27th of March [1942], is widely quoted to uphold or support the extermination thesis. It is not consistent with entries in the diary like this one of March 7th, and it is not consistent with entries at a later date from the Goebbels diaries, and it is not consistent with German documents from a later date.

[�] there is a great doubt about the authenticity of the entire Goebbels diaries because they are written on typewriter. We have no real way of verifying if they are accurate, and the U.S. Government certified, in the beginning of the publication, [�] that it can take no responsibility for the accuracy of the diaries as a whole.

[�] I think again it is worth mentioning that the passage of the 27th of March is inconsistent with the passage of the 7th of March and the one from April, and I don�t remember the date exact (Transcript, p. 5820-5821). Goebbels had no responsibility for Jewish policy. He wasn�t involved in that. He was the Propaganda Minister. He was involved only to the extent that there were Jews in Berlin and he was responsible for Berlin (p. 5822-5823).

How can Weber today invoke a wholly doubtful document and, in that document, a passage that is particularly suspect? Is it because at some time between 1988 and 2009 he completely changed his mind on these points? If so, when did he ever advise us of the change, and what were the reasons for such a turn-around?

10. A sorry case

In former times I�d have taken the trouble to write to Weber in order to put these questions to him, but experience has taught me, as one can see, that he�s a man who shirks requests for explanation, or else cheats in his answers.

Destiny has now punished him for such behaviour. It was in December 2008 that Weber wrote his �How Relevant is Holocaust Revisionism?� In that text, he dared to assert that these days �the Holocaust imagery of the 1940s is less potent because it�s less relevant,� adding that, from now on, �Holocaust revisionism cannot play a central role� or even, as we�ve seen above, that �Holocaust revisionism has proved to be as much a hindrance as a help.�

However, hardly had Weber written those words when �Holocaust� revisionism was to make a spectacular return onto the world stage. It was, in fact, at the very end of December 2008 and in January 2009 that there hatched what historians may perhaps one day see as the start of a revisionist revival. Preceded by the Dieudonn� affair and followed by the Abrahamowicz affair, the Williamson affair, whatever its eventual conclusion, will have brilliantly highlighted that �Holocaust revisionism� is very much alive and that the grounds on which the religion of the alleged Nazi gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews stands are extraordinarily weak.

There was a way to reply publicly to Mgr Richard Williamson. It would have been enough to show us on television a single gas chamber or a single document allowing all to see just what such a weapon of mass destruction might look like. However, he has not been answered with any photograph, technical drawing, document or anything of the kind. Instead, he�s been deposed, had insults heaped upon him, told to go to hell, threatened with legal proceedings and prison, and put on notice to confess his error.

But the height of his enemies� misfortune and, for the traditionalist Catholic he is, an irony of fate as well, is that if ever he did fall to his knees before the new Inquisition he would immediately remind everyone of Galileo, the man whom science and history ended up acknowledging to be right despite his abjuration. Even if he wound up losing, Richard Williamson would thus have won, and history along with him.

As for Mark Weber, he has disgraced himself. He has proved that he possesses neither the clear-sightedness, nor the will, nor the courage needed to lead, at the head of the IHR, the tough struggle that today has started up again so forcefully, that of �Holocaust revisionism.� He must therefore resign from the IHR.

February 10, 2009
Final proofing 23 March
Published 3 April 2009 in Smith�s Report #160
http://robertfaurisson.blogspot.com/...institute.html

MultiKult Communism eats the White Race, bit by bit.

GOLAZ — Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:43:56 GMT

Where I live, it's still a white majority community, safe and more cohesive, in contrast to the shithole of a northern county infested with common crime (always spic and nigger), rampant liberalism and common miscegenation.

College I attend has a libtard newspaper that calls itself "independent voice" ("independent" is code for egalitarian-communist; newsweekly newspapers like New Times franchise is typical of this plague).

Here are the following columns written by pompous liberal faggots, for your education and amusement (if you can stomach reading these stupid articles) to know who are the enemies striving to undermine America and attack European-American (and anything European) culture, heritage, etc. "By fruits ye know them."

(The links are obscured with re-direction to deny the commies the information where the hit came from so they won't whine and complain; one particular libtard newspaper company threatened a White Nationalist forum [run by Don Black] for direct link to their articles. The linked titles are my summaries.)

Liberal faggot professor whines about "blackface" Halloween costume and urge "tolerance."

Pictured is the whiny liberal fag professor; check out the earring. He lives in the capital city in another county that is diversity-adulating and fag-friendly.

Mulatto (Puero Rico spic mixed with Haitian nigger) columnist self-titles, "the whitest black kid you've ever met" (edit note: URL is screwed up, broken link. Try search engine term "The Whitest Black Kid You've Ever Met".)

Anecdote: I recognized him in public on campus, walking with two libtard metalheads, and I gave him a thumbs down as we passed each other by in opposite direction. He looked shocked.

Nigger woman proclaims "racism won't go away"; complains about "discrimination" on campus; she claims she got singled out for writing "too well" in English class and was suspected of plagiarism. (Notwithstanding the fact niggers are common plagiarists as students; Michael [Martin Luther] King Jr was a major plagiarist that even communist professors in Humanities, "Diversity" and English courses love, while preaching about the consequence for plagiarism, which is hypocritical and ironic. I've heard this "praise MLK/negro" bullshit in class.)

The columnist whines angrily about "gay bashing" in reaction to recent homo bashing in a major city which was major news with judiacized (illegal alien & degenerate sanctuary city policy) police attention. Heinrich Himmler's statement on the necessity of exterminating confirmed homosexuals is legendary which I concur with 100%. The columnist is a major "tolerance now or you a bigot!" queer. Good for a laugh at the columnist's self-righteous outrage.

"Diversity is our strength" article. Note the race mixture of the anti-white & probable pro-illegal alien asshole who supports graffiti as a form of artistic expression. Puke :31: "Diversity," like "anti-racist," equals anti-white and supports displacement of European populace. I support diversity...only for European ethnicities within White-only nations (USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Argentine, Uruguay, Brazil, South Africa, etc in addition to Western & Eastern Europe.) Here's information (another article here) that exposes this vile anti-white, pro-illegal alien, pro-vandalism mongrel a-hole.

Nigger writes about his "sprinting life," with nigger buddies in Africa. He whines about Sunday (while in America heartland) being "boring and lonely" from the perspective of a coal-skinned jogger. What the fuck did he expect? He comes to America from the Netherlands...as an illegal alien of West African origin. He fought for several years to get the Dutch citizenship then got it and got the Dutch passport to live in America as a college student. Nigger dreams of making it to the London Olympics. He is a local "celebrity" here for "nigger worship," nauseating. Wikipedia biography on his illegal immigrant life in Holland. Nigger, like spic and almond eye, have no regard for our law, American, European, Australian and elsewhere, that criminalizes illegal immigration. They come to stay with stubborn tenacity and resistance, take and destroy like parasites, Jew approved.

Article on the new faggot & dyke club, with typical screed for "tolerance". The ending paragraphs are laughable with inane communist delusion. I've seen the club flyers on campus, the photographed fags and dykes look degenerate. Sickening that they are imposing their fag values on campus while even the contemplation of a club for European only is "horrifying" for the politically correct morons and their league of degenerates, commies and anti-white agitators.

A pretentious libtard's whiny column about the "homogeneous White" culture in the overwhelmingly Republican state which he complains is against illegal/third world immigration and homosexual rights. I posted the comment as "White Man," third comment down. Some comments defend the column, a few comments condemn the delusional and self-important fag. Reading the column is simultaneously amusing and infuriating at how much of a raving libtard the columnist/former editor is (he left the college after the semester ended, because of pet peeves listed by him that he views to be "anti-progressive"). An insight into the insane young libtard's mind.

While the particular campus has the student population that is slightly more conservative (over half is my guess), by and large (the former at least half or more; there are humble and non-"overbearing anti-white dogmatic asshole" conservative instructors) the faculty and student newspaper writers & editors are confirmed libtards (some openly communist with the club called Revolutionary Students Union which espouses Leninist-Marxist-Maoist Socialism with semi-regular meetings; see the commie club web page and YouTube channel here [with YouTube video series of retards spouting communist theory rhetoric], at your risk).

I might try starting my own club that supports Old Republican principles (Founding Fathers' vision of a White-only American nation and staunch pro-conservative) or maybe Neo-Fascism (supporting the Fascist theory established in fact by Franco, Mussolini, etc; Hitler's views on Jews, communism, etc and National Socialism philosophy may be gradually introduced while lessening controversy due to complaints by commies and brainwashed pseudo-conservatives crying to the administration and the media about how "evil" the club is in contrast to R.S.U. and ethnocentric ("except white") clubs). Unfortunately, there is a criteria that requires the adviser, and just about everyone where I live probably object to "Fascism," "National Socialism" and "White Nationalism", thanks to Jew/Cultural Marxist brainwashing that triggers shame and "white guilt".

The other day I e-mailed the local library about donating a mint copy of David Duke's "Jewish Supremacism" and the donation question was answered with a denial by the collections librarian who claim the book is "too technical or academic" and therefore rejected my offer, likely in negative reaction to the title alone. Yet the library have plenty of anti-white, Holohoax, multiculturalism and interracial dating/marriage literature in addition to the "too technical/academic" book "The Israel Lobby" and the mistranslated & censored/truncated book "Mein Kampf" by Ralph Manheim (complete with anti-NS garbage footnotes and the new kike introduction forced by goldbricker kikes).

I hate liberalism, egalitarianism and anti-white political correctness. Thank the Lord for Steve Barry, SFC Ret., who finally woke me up with his columns in the legendary (now-defunct) The Resister: Political Warfare Journal of the Special Forces, which, in conjunction with further readings such as Pat Buchanan's "The Death of the West" and "Suicide of a Superpower" and observations as a survivor of the near-rough streets of Rochester, New York; Pontiac, Michigan (close to where niggerland Detroit is), Chatsworth/San Francisco, California; Manhattan (Big Apple), New York; and Salt Lake County, where I saw rampant miscegenation among white male/female and third world wastelands with crime patterns attributed to the inferior and unassimilable non-white scum (majority negro in one area, wetback in another).

If only we have more Steve Barrys (a former libertarian and repentant anti-racist himself; by the end of the newsletter's run, he is a full-blown White Nationalist and confident & unapologetic Supremacist, having had a wake-up call when he was a deployed soldier in Haiti the Nigger-infested Third World) editorializing and speaking from heart, wisdom and lifetime experience, then we should awaken the millions of European-descent people that must overcome the brainwashing imposed and enforced by the kikes and cultural Marxists to demoralize and destruct our race.

Video clips of the demise of Western Civilization:

Europe in 2029

Europe Then and Now

Why Europe Will Not Survive Multiculturalism

"Who Opened the Immigration Floodgate?" animation clip appear to be banished everywhere on the Web. I believe this particular clip is one of the most frequently banned anti-kike/pro-WN clips on the Net. Try to find it if you can.

Lawyers, Local Authorities, FBI perform Negro worship and bow to Jewish masters

Ryan J. Murdough — Tue, 01 Nov 2011 14:39:49 GMT

It is downright pathetic to see the amount of manpower and effort devoted to an incident of vandalism while White America continues to suffer from the effects of a rapidly growing non-White population. While authorities and law enforcement scramble to perform Negro worship and bow to their Jewish masters, White people in New Hampshire and all across the United States are experiencing racial reality the hard way. For decades White people have watched their once safe communities turn into multiracial, dangerous, hellholes due to non-White violence and degradation. At the same time, multiculturalism and diversity has been sold to White people as something that is absolutely essential to their existence. These "authorities" who promote and support the flooding of White communities with non-White, third worlders most likely go home at the end of the day to their predominantly white neighborhoods and send their children to predominantly White schools. Some of the most strident promoters of "diversity" are actually complete hypocrites. They preach about how enriching racial diversity is to White people and how it is a strength but their actions in their private lives are completely opposite because deep down they know the truth. They are simply cowards and traitors who are more than willing to sacrifice the well being of White families in order to preserve their precious social status.

If in fact the author of the words on those houses was White, one would have to wonder if that person is simply fed up with the actions of our Judaized government because of the fact that it is directly responsible for the destruction of White America. Could it be possible that a few White people are finally getting sick and tired of watching their hometowns and schools being overrun with non-Whites and the "enrichment" that they bring? In the past, Rabbi's and other Jews have been known to paint swastikas on walls and signs in order to garner sympathy from the sheepish masses. More recently, a Negro was caught posing as a KKK member writing threatening letters to police departments. It wouldn't surprise me one bit if the actual author of these messages on the houses in Concord was not White at all.

All in all, authorities were very quick to defend the non-White immigrants even though they have no clue who did the writing. Perhaps if White Americans had a government that acted in their interests this type of thing might be avoided altogether. Either way, this incident just proved once again that our government is actively working to achieve one goal, the destruction of our Aryan blood. Media outlets go out of their way to censor the truth about race and violent crime. They actively promote racial diversity by creating stories that are intended to make people believe that a multiracial society is a healthy thing for White people. Meanwhile, the destruction of White America continues and beautiful states like New Hampshire continue to be a dumping ground for non-White, third worlders. If New Hampshire continues to be taken in the direction that these traitors and cowards are taking us, our young ones will someday inherit their creation, an unrecognizable, non-White cesspool. As a husband and father I vehemently oppose what those in power are doing to the state of New Hampshire and will continue to work tirelessly to raise the racial consciousness of White people.

Ryan J. Murdough
National Political Director
National Socialist American Labor Party

Our Duty and Our Calling

Ryan J. Murdough — Tue, 01 Nov 2011 14:38:10 GMT

I love being a National Socialist. I love having my name associated with the Swastika. I wish that I had been educated on the subject of National Socialism a long time ago but unfortunately the Jews got their hooks in every facet of American life a long time ago and have been successful in transforming a once White and proud society into a self- loathing, guilt filled one. This is what motivates me the most. I am more than willing to sacrifice my name and reputation for my views. As bad as things might seem now, I know what my children are headed for if something is not done. I'm not special. I am simply a White Husband and Father who has had enough and has chosen to do something about it.

What the Jews have managed to do in the United States is brilliant to be honest. To be able to systematically brainwash, manipulate, and control the White masses via media, government, financial, and academic institutions is impressive. I believe it is going to take brilliance to defeat our enemy but more than that I believe it is going to take very hard work and an iron will. Activism is how we engage our enemies and the Folk at the same time. Activism can be anything that positively promotes National Socialism and the National Socialist American Labor Party. Because so many lies have been told about National Socialism and because many like- minded Comrades have used National Socialism to justify their profane and destructive behavior, National Socialism does not have a very good reputation among the White masses. It is our job to portray true National Socialism by the way we conduct ourselves in every aspect of our lives. We must show people that the type of National Socialist that the Jew media loves to portray is not what we are. Someday the Jews stranglehold on the media will be broken forever but until that day comes we must only be concerned with what we have control over, ourselves.

We must take the message to the Folk. Where do people go? Anywhere, anytime, there can be a an opportunity for activism, as long as it is legal of course. There are many places in which fliers, business cards, and newsletters can be distributed. Use your imagination. It is possible for people to awaken and become active National Socialists, but we must effectively bring the message to them. A few years ago I was one of the sheeple. Back then I would have never guessed that I would be doing what I do now. The thing is, once you become an open, active National Socialist, there is no going back. Your life will never be the same. I wouldn't want it any other way. Many of those who participate in pro-White activism will tell you that National Socialism is a waste of time and it will never work. I used to say that too. In reality, those are the people who are either uneducated about National Socialism as I was, or they are simply afraid to take that next step. National Socialism is the answer for our people and we will be proven correct someday. Let our detractors continue to embrace the very things that are destroying them.

The bottom line is that we need to be doing something but we must be effective. The National Socialist American Labor Party is growing. I wish I could read the minds and get the reactions of the people who hate us as they realize we are making significant progress. As we grow so too will the level of our opposition. We expect it, and are planning for it. This is a calling and our duty is to answer the call. Will you choose to live an honorable, Aryan life and answer the call by becoming open, active National Socialists? We have a vision and we are motivated. Will you join us?

Ryan J. Murdough
National Political Director
National Socialist American Labor Party

The Protocols - Zion's vicegrip

OrderofThule — Fri, 30 Sep 2011 14:47:45 GMT

"We must so direct the education of goyim communities that whenever they come upon a matter requiring initiative that they may drop their hands in despairing impotence. The strain which results from freedom of action saps the forces when it meets with the freedom of another. From this collusion may arise grave moral shocks, disenchantment's, failures. By all means we shall so wear down the goyim that they will be compelled to offer us international power of a nature of a nature that by its position will enable us without any violence gradually to absorb all the state forces of the world & set up a super-government."

Taken from Protocol 6, l believe this paragraph predicts what over 100 years ago was anticipated as part of judaic manifesto for global domination to the realisation of a "New World Order" presided over by a political elite both jewish & gentile through the witting agents of judaic political & economic interest - puppets which the jewish cabal regard as "shabbez goy", these willing pawns of jewish interest are to be found in Britain's jewish aristrocracy (as described by Arnold Leese), the Illuminati, the hidden hand of freemasonary, the captains of industry, media moguls, the judiciary/legal system, political leaders (of all parties) right down to the the EDL's fanatically pro-zionist leadership who subvert & misdirect what should be an open revolt by Britain's youth against the imposition of multi-culturlism and the destruction our nation through the liberal social & political engineering of the cowardly politicians in Westminster's giant synagogue.

Returning to the Protocols "When we introduced into the state organism the poison of liberalism its whole political completion underwent a change. States have been seized with a mortal illness - blood poisoning. All that remains is to await the end of their death agony". Who can reasonably deny this statement - in fact the blood-poisoning may be taken quite literally when we look at the rise of AIDS & the importation of alien breeds deliberately calculated to destroy the British People through resultant racial interbreeding.

"We have fooled, bemused & corrupted the youth of the goyim by rearing them in principles & theories which are known to be false although it is by us they have been inculcated".

Taken from the 9th Protocol, again the grim reality is undeniable, look to the braindead MTV generation, sheeple to be fleeced by big-business interests & raised on a diet of mindless multi-racism, with white youth mimicking the African in terms of "gangsta culture", dress & jungle mannerisms. The term "whigger" aptly describes the zombified youth of today. The prodigy of the jewish "comedian" Sasha Baron Cohen & his moronic alter-ego, "Ali G" - a generation lost to drugs, degeneracy, media manipulation, and the death cult of multi-racism.

Whilst BNSM opposes the presence of Islamic communities in the UK, it is a fact that insular Islam lives by the principles of Sharia Law rejecting the false values of multi-racial decadence - their rejection of liberalism has enraged politicians across the political spectrum right up to David Cameron (who is himself partly jewish). Did the protocols envisage "westernising" the alien & Asiatic peoples temporarily resident in the UK? Well, now ZOG is spending millions to combat extremism in lslamic communities in the UK & attempt to integrate them into a crumbling, terminally ill multi-racial society.

Similarly, the arab nations which refuse to bow to the dictates of the zionist dictates of the NWO, will share the fate of Saddam & the lraqi nation, now controlled by judeo-western politicians. The fate envisaged for lraq & Libya...

Protocol 15 "We shall create & multiply freemasonic lodges in all the countries of the world, absorb into them all who may become or are prominent in public activity, for in these Lodges we shall find our principle intelligence office & means of influence."

Thus we see the entirely jewish nature & doctrine of the universalist & cosmopolitan nature of "the craft".Arnold Leese described it thus, "This total conspiracy, with the jew as common denominator encompassed not only socialo-bolshevism & usury capitalism, but also Freemasonry, liberalism & democracy".

My old copy of the Protocols is now dog-eared & yellowed with age, l purchased it in 1982 from the then British Patriot Publications arm of the BNSM in Shotton, N.Wales. Through the years l have looked to the incredible prophecy of book's edicts for an explanation into the incomprehensible events which have shaped the end of the millennium & the opening years of the 21st Century. With underlined passages l could fill several editions of this publication - but l will conclude with the closing paragraph of this sinister volume.

"The day its not distant when all the riches & treasures of the earth will become the property of the children of Israel.... "

Make of that what you will.

Now at the eNat Store... Creations from My Europa!

ein_hass — Thu, 08 Sep 2011 00:44:07 GMT

Now on the eNat Sore we will be featuring art work from My Europa. All item are available for purchase right here on the eNat Store.

http://enationalist.com/forum/cartplog.php

Black Sun

ein_hass — Thu, 08 Sep 2011 00:38:51 GMT

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-g7t_X15SjY

Black Sun

ein_hass — Thu, 08 Sep 2011 00:37:32 GMT

First of all is the SONNENRAD. Schwarze Sonne, or Black Sun.. Each is unique in it's own way. all are hand made and painted one at a time. so no two are exactly alike. the finishing touches are available in either GOLD,,SILVER,or BRONZE, The Sonnenrad has a Runic Invokation which goes completely around the base of the piece. Which states.. HAUNEBU ARISE,and also as a Fulfillment of Prophecy, The Schwarze Sonne, when exposed to Black Light will Glow a Violent Nuclear Green glow,as each piece is infused with the rare Phosphoresent, earth Mineral META-AUTUNITE, this is clear layer,infused into the finish of each schwarze Sonne. And Meta-autunite has a half life of 250 million years, so you won't ever have to worry about your Black sun not glowing the green rays. Also Each Black sun comes with One Uranyl Oxide, Vaseline Crackle glass activation Stone which sets perfect in the center of the Sculpture. the base of the Schwarze Sonne, is Leather, which gives it a nice appealing look..

http://enationalist.com/forum/cartpl...logproductid=6